The hiring chair · Build your interview

Four steps to an interview
that actually predicts

Structured interviews sit at the top of the evidence rankings for predicting who will do the job well (Sackett et al., 2022). Structure is four decisions, made once, before anyone walks in. Make them here, print your guide, and walk in ready. Like everything on The Table, what you build stays on your device.

Step one Name the job's real requirements

Requirements are functions, never proxies. What does a person actually have to do here?

Essential functions (pick up to five; edit them to match your reality)

Step two Pick the method mix for this role

Recommendations update to your role type. Structured questions are always in; the evidence says they carry the most weight, so they are not optional here.

Step three Write the anchored questions

One question per essential function. Choose behavioral (their past) or situational (a scenario), then edit the wording and the three anchors until they sound like your workplace. The anchors are what you score against, so make weak, solid, and strong concrete.

Pick a role type and functions in step one, and your questions will build themselves here.

Step four Commit to the scoresheet

Score each answer 1 (weak), 2 (solid), or 3 (strong) during the interview, not from memory afterward. Total the sheet. Rank candidates by total. Mechanically combining scores beats holistic gut integration of the same information (Kuncel et al., 2013). The sheet decided, and that protects you, the candidate, and the hire you almost talked yourself out of.

Your guide is assembled on this page and printed from your browser. It is never sent to us, and it is not stored on any server.

Structure is the fairness mechanism

The instrument you just built is not paperwork. Identical resumes get different callbacks by name and by record, and that has not improved in 25 years of field experiments. The same anchored questions that best predict performance are also what give a candidate with a record, a gap, or no degree their fairest shot: everyone answers the same questions, and the scoresheet decides.

Bertrand and Mullainathan, 2004; Pager, 2003; Quillian et al., 2017